🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.