🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.